The year was 1988. I was restless. I was bored, exhausted, used up and maybe a little pissed at the current state of Rock music. Let me run down a few highlights or lowlights of that year, dependent on personal taste.
* Van Halen released 'OU812'.
* "Acid House" music rampaged the UK, later to be named 'Second Summer of Love'.
* CDs outsold vinyl for the first time.
* Zappa's last tour in Rock format.
* Roy Orbison gives his last concert.
* LA Guns, Bonnie Tyler, The Church, Living Colour, The Escape Club, Happy Mondays all release tunes.
* Billboard Magazine created a new category to their charts, "Hot Modern Rock Tracks".
A resurgence of sorts had surfaced and blasted away some old concepts to challenge listeners: the Modern Rock movement. Whatever that means. I'm not one to classify and compartmentalize specific genres into neat and tidy cubicles, defining and strapping a performer by their sound. Nu Metal. Heavy Metal. Hard Rock. Christian Rock. Jazz Rock. Pop Rock. Stoner Rock. And countless more. Please, could somebody tell me the difference between Smooth Jazz and Contemporary Jazz? Heavy Metal and Hard Rock? What exactly defines Post Rock? Blues Rock? Jazz Rock? I had read where music journalists coined these phrases to add some luster to their writings and instill a sense of uniqueness and originality. Maybe just to sell music with a fancy tag. At the end of the day, Rock is Rock and Roll. Jazz is Jazz. World music is World. Reggae is Reggae. See how simple it can be?
Somewhere in '88, I heard a strange and foreign band that completely broke my previous conceptions of Rock. Disarray and lack of cohesiveness jumped at me. Squalls and layers of guitars. Odd time signatures. Abrupt chord changes. And a voice that was cartoonish. My interest was piqued and horrified at the same moment. It was fresh and confused my senses. The band was Jane's Addiction.
Should I tune in or tune out, accept or dismiss this band? Because I was immersed at this time of feeling betrayed by Rock, I decided to give it a chance. The CD was "Nothing's Shocking" and all conventions of staid Rock 'n Roll were tossed out with that first listen. I was shocked and disturbed by it's cover: two women, maybe fused together at the shoulders and hip, nude on an oversized rocking chair, flames jettisoning out of their heads and a look that seemed to say "Are we shocking enough for you"? I was shocked by lyrics proclaiming "I had a Dad, Big and strong, Turned around, Found my Daddy gone, Got that funny feeling, He's not there at all". Did Dad die or abandon the vocalist/lyricist Perry Farrell; is there bitterness and hatred or compassion and acceptance? I was moved by the simplicity of a complex emotion being crashed and slashed with ferocious intensity, not only from the whiplash guitar/bass/drums but to that voice asking or stating the obvious. The emotional level of that one song, combined with another equally poignant "Jane Says", hit me hard. There was passion and feelings amid the turmoil and brutality that swirled throughout this disc.
This set the stage for other strange and unique music, giving me hope that Rock was not dead, just awakening from an overdue nap. The Red Hot Chili Peppers had been on the scene since '84, unbeknownst to me. My first exposure was "Mother's Milk" ('89) and RHCP took the torch and blistered. I had to fall back and enjoy their brand of whacked-out mayhem, starting with their first, self-titled ('84) and "Freaky Styley" ('85), produced and profoundly influenced by George Clinton.
Both bands were loose, disjointed at times, feeling as if every song was going over a cliff. At times, they did. But more often than not, there were glorious moments of violent musicianship, disruption and pure skill. This was one thing that stood above all else: massive talent. These guys could play.
Another annoying label started grouping bands around this time and it affectionately was called Grunge. Ugh. Who thought that one up? Short and simple, it was bands that ground out working man Rock, wearing flannel/plaid/lumberjack shirts, jeans, work boots, straggly long hair and had a punk attitude. Never mind that the core bands put out some of the best blazing and original Rock in a long time. Nirvana: '89-'93. Alice in Chains: '90-'94. Pearl Jam and Soundgarden: '91-'94. These guys helped push conventional Rock into a different direction. And by '94, it was over. Though a few bands are still around, I doubt if they like to be described by terms rendered obsolete. Modern Rock and Grunge were clearly vagrant life-forms that stopped by for a few drinks and bid adieu. It had engulfed my ears for six or seven years, shaking and nervously rocking, waiting for its own demise that was clearly of its own doing. And rightfully so. The general public's short attention span tightened and demanded new genres, new tags, new compartments, new titles to classify. Too numerous to count. And in the end, it's only Rock and Roll. And I like it.



























